Last Thursday night saw a fairly historic moment in The Forge’s history. If you happened to be in New York’s financial district, you would have found 2 of us – committed carnivores – wandering in and out of 3 different restaurants in search of the Impossible Burger.

Now let’s be clear on one thing: Burgers are something we take very seriously at The Forge. For almost 6 years now, Friday has been burger day. We traipse off to a local eatery to sample the burgers on offer at any potential joint in SW6 & SW15. But in all that time, I can guarantee one thing: not once has a vegan burger been ordered. But last week, that changed. Why?

For those of you who may not have heard of the Impossible Burger, let me explain. 

Impossible Foods the company behind the burger, are on a mission:

Screenshot 2019-05-01 at 15.38.55.png


That mission is not exactly unique. Google any of the array of vegan start up brands and you will no doubt generate many hundreds of very similar missions. But Impossible Foods have done something that very few others have done – they’ve made the impossible possible.

They’ve taken the US by storm, with a vegan burger that bleeds like a burger, smells like a burger, and as Steven and I can attest from last week, it damn well tastes like a burger too.

No bones about it: this is the real deal. And it’s going mainstream. Just a couple of days ago, Burger King announced it will be selling the “Impossible Whopper” nationwide by the end of the year, following a successful trial.

Impossible Whopper.jpg

With the power and distribution of BK behind them, this will change the game. Vegan burgers have historically been the niche preserve of a small audience willing to compromise on the reality that vegan burgers don’t taste like meat burgers! As a result, the decision to buy one starts as a compromise…and ends as a compromise. Worth it for some. Absolutely not for others.

But what happens when that changes? What happens when the choices are no longer compromised? What happens, when the impossible becomes possible?

What Impossible Foods are achieving should send shockwaves through every single category of consumer goods: what happens when your category offers all the upsides, with none of the downsides? Just take a look at Impossible Foods’ ambitions:

And that’s just the beginning. Over the next few years, the best pork, the best chicken, the best fish, cheese, eggs the world has ever seen will be made directly from plants, using the knowhow and tools Impossible Foods is developing today. The biggest realization we’ve had so far is that the replacement of animals as the dominant technology for producing meat, fish and dairy foods is inevitable and coming soon. In the next decade, all of the foods we get today from animals will begin to be replaced by plant-based counterparts

Impossible Foods are choosing a specific compromise battle that they feel people are making – and one they can win – as shown in this interview with founder Pat Brown by The Guardian newspaper:


Q: You’ve said your burger is healthier for us. How?

 We think we’ve made choices that have the net effect of making this better for consumers’ health than what it replaces. There are intrinsic safety issues with food from animals. You can’t make ground beef without faecal bacteria getting into it. It’s part of the process. That carries irreducible food safety hazards which we can readily avoid.

 There is no cholesterol [in our burger] ... there is a significant population of people for whom it [cholesterol] has negative health consequences. There is also data suggesting that mammalian meat triggers an inflammatory response in humans that has some negative health consequences that we don’t have with our product.


Note the nuance in the definition of healthier. “The net effect of making this better for consumers”. There isn’t an absolute definition of healthier, but even if there was, that is not a battle Impossible Foods are trying to win. Instead, they are focused on winning the main compromise battle for burgers: taste. If that comes with some other benefits, all the better!

 Let’s take a look the implications for some other categories



Low fat, low calorie chocolate. The holy grail, right? Anyone who has ever sat through any bit of research on chocolate will no doubt have heard people wax lyrical about what an amazing idea that is. Yet, on the slightest digging, it falls apart. Everyone knows that it is the fat, sugar and calories that makes it taste amazing. Take that out and it tastes awful! Why bother?

And that’s true. Well at least it has been (and currently is) true. But look to a parallel category and it starts to look quite different:


Halo Top have done what can’t be done. They’ve made low calorie ice cream that is delicious and feels every bit as indulgent and exciting as full fat – but without the downsides (or at least massively reduced downsides).

So yes, it isn’t possible (yet) in chocolate. But would I be betting against it? Absolutely not. It will happen. It’s just a matter of time.


Household Cleaners:

In other categories, the compromise is one of ‘nasties’ vs ‘efficacy’. Brands like 7th Generation and more recently Method, have been leading the revolution in Household cleaning to convince people that you don’t need harsh chemicals to live in a clean and hygienic world. With similar evangelistic zeal to Impossible Foods, they are mission led and have a clear sense of the compromise that they want to remove – harsh chemicals that damage us and our planet.

The purchase decision in HH cleaning is a singular one: efficacy. Everyone wants cleaning products that work. Without that base efficacy, what is the point?

Traditionally that means harsh chemicals. But what if it didn’t have to? What if you could get that same efficacy levels without that? Then what? I highly doubt anyone is ideologically attracted to harsh chemicals in the same way that people are with natural ingredients. No doubt cost will always play a role...but beyond that, what reason do people have NOT to ditch the traditional harsh cleaners and adopt more natural alternatives?

The same is true in Personal Care. If for the same price, you could get equally effective anti-perspirant effects without having to have aluminium, would you? Likewise, sunscreen without Zinc Oxide or femcare without synthetic fibres? Would you?

 When these innovations come (and you can argue in a number of cases, that they are already here – albeit not at a mainstream accessible price yet), they will fundamentally transform these categories. The traditional trade off choice hierarchy won’t exist anymore. What is to stop overnight wholesale switching?


The trade off’s are disappearing:

Different categories have different choice hierarchies and the degree of potential trade off varies hugely. Some have fairly singular choices. Others are far more multi-faceted. Take beer for example. ABV is just one of many different variables that impact decision – alongside taste profile, calories, bloating, etc… But what is becoming clear is that even in these multi-faceted categories, the stark trade-offs that existed are disappearing.

Heineken 0.0 is one of the most successful brand launches in beer in recent years and one of the fastest growing beers. Why? Because it is actually a pretty good taste profile for a zero-alcohol beer. Not perfect. Probably not at Impossible Burger’s equivalent level – but not far off. And if, like me, you are optimistic about human’s inexorable progress, it won’t be long before a brewer cracks it.

Heinken 0.0.png

No category is immune:

There are no hard and fast rules here. Every category is different. But what is clear is that no brand can afford to rest on their laurels. It is not enough to say “it can’t be done!”, because the answer is “YET!” (as my sister always tells her class of 8-year olds whenever one of them declares they can’t do something).

No category is immune. It might not happen tomorrow. But it will happen. And when it does, it can have profound and huge impact on your business.

Not convinced? I think there are a few thousand cattle farmers in the US right now who are having some sleepless nights. Here’s Eric Bohl, Director of public affairs at the Missouri Farm Bureau:

“If farmers and ranchers think we can mock and dismiss these products as a passing fad, we’re kidding ourselves.

This is not just another disgusting tofu burger that only a dedicated hippie could convince himself to eat.

If I didn’t know what I was eating, I would have no idea it was not beef. Farmers and ranchers need to take notice and get ready to compete. I’ve tasted it with my own mouth, and this fake meat is ready for prime time.”

Today burgers. Tomorrow…who knows? Is your category next?

Time to start planning for what happens when the impossible is no longer impossible